Learned On | gender, consumer behavior and sustainability

Learned On...

The Humanized Appeal of innocent drinks

Innocent_smoothie My ongoing research into companies/brands that are “humanized” or incorporate humanizing elements in a longer term journey toward humanization (say that three times fast), depends on the kindness of business contacts and readers who give me leads.  I’m happy to report that I was recently given the “heads up” about a clever, customer-loving smoothie company based in the U.K. – “innocent drinks.” When I read up a bit, I found that their mission, goals and vision all stem from, a) the fact the founders themselves love smoothies and b) they had a very strong connection with their core customers, right from the start.

In a 2004 profile written by Peter Crush of Marketing Direct , innocent drinks  founder and marketing director, Richard Reed, put it this way:

“’We talk about customers as the Innocent Family.  As such we want our marketing to amplify the truth of the brand,’ he says.  ‘We don’t define our drinkers by age or by sex, but more by their attributes – wanting good healthy food, who are cause and environmentally aware, but are also kind of kooky.’”

Later in the piece, Reed is quoted as saying, “’Everything we do has to be something that people actually want.  That’s our only guiding principle.’”

Brilliant, as my friends in London would say. 

Please note this: from the very, very beginning (1998), innocent drinks invited, nay required, feedback to continue their business.  At the small jazz festival where it all began, the founders, then university students, put out two bins in front of their stall to collect the recyclable bottles: one was a “yes” bin and the other was a “no” bin.  The question smoothie drinkers were asked to vote on via their bottle toss: “Should we quit our jobs and dedicate our time to building a fruit smoothie empire?”  You know the answer.

The three founders started with roughly $1000 USD and now run a successful company with 50 staff members in a place they named “Fruit Towers.”

As for a few of the humanizing elements of their web site:

  • Relatable copy style.  Here’s an example from the “our story” page :

We call them innocent because our drinks are always completely pure, fresh and unadulterated. Anything you ever find in an innocent bottle will always be 100% natural and delicious -and if it isn’t, get  on the banana phone and make us beg for forgiveness. “

  • Front and center recognition/posting of customer input.  (You can link to a “you” section from their about us page and read “some nice things that people have said” about innocent.)
  • Their cause sponsorship is 100% aligned with their business, and that section of the site is called what it is, “Doing Good Things.”

  • They have photos of all the staff members on their “contact” page.  PLUS, if you roll over them, you can see a baby photo of the person as well!  I’m not kidding.

Adambaby

  • Their site is simply put, fun, and my how it makes me wish I could drink their products and get to know them more.

The caveat, of course, is that small entrepreneurial companies will always have the advantage in being able to connect with, and staying connected to, their roots and their passionate core customers.  Part of my current research is to try to identify some of those larger brands (in the U.S. and internationally) that are showing signs of climbing out of their corporate inertia by way of humanizing aspects of their business.

I invite your comments and feedback, as always.  Any discussion will guide my further digging around on this topic, so I thank you in advance.

Now, aren’t you just dyin’ for a smoothie?

Gemma_baby

Bookmark and Share
  • Hey, love your analysis of the Innocent brand and its component parts. Your blog is fantastic!
  • Julie
    Thanks Andrea. I feel myself nodding my head as I read your comment. I was struck by your reference to "focusing on reaching the likely core group of passionate fund-givers". I would describe that as their target audience or niche. I wonder what the ROI looks like to Heifer (one of my favorite nonprofits) when you market to a wider audience of "kind hearted folks" vs. people who donate to third world nations and families - their niche. My guess is that like everything they are trying to strike a balance. Perhaps that is where nonprofits lose the authenticity.
  • Great question, Julie. First, I just found out about an organization called the Cause Marketing Forum that may be some hope for nonprofits needing some marketing help after all... Here's a link to their "Halo" award archives http://www.causemarketingforum.com/page.asp?ID=279

    And, yes - I think nonprofits must face the same thing brands are facing these days. Consumers see too much clutter - and are looking for the finer details (the humanized elements, perhaps?) to help them discern where their consuming and giving dollars should go.

    Glitz and fancy creative on the most expensive paper direct mailed to a mailing list ain't gonna do it - because there is stack of the same sort of thing already in the recycling bin at most houses.

    Another thought is that the population is aging a bit and so the majority of folks are Boomers who have "seen it all" by now - and are more cynical about causes. Nonprofits have to really work on their authenticity (and they have to do better at proving that dollars donated go to the cause and not the fundraisers).

    I suspect that giving folks a better way to identify with the particular cause, and focusing on reaching the likely core group of passionate fund-givers, will be key. One way to provide more places where a consumer or fund-giver can connect with your brand or nonprofit is by creating many places where there is some sort of human touch. (pictures of the staff or pictures and testimonials of the people who were helped by the fund, etc.)

    One of the reasons the world has been so generous in giving to the Tsunami victims, I think, is thanks to the media (which we often can't find reason to thank). Because there are cameras right there and we see images of the women, children and families affected in real time (almost) - our heart strings are tugged and we identify with the victims (as in "that could well be me in those circumstances"). When we hear the stories and see the pictures, it is very hard not to find the extra money in our wallet to give.
  • Julie
    It's been making me think....all this authenticity stuff in the for profit world. What about the nonprofits (a personal favorite of mine)? They need a little head banging too. Obviously last quarter was big for all of them to generate donations. Who is doing it right? - telling a true and unique story, making a connection without the shrink wrap of direct marketing. I'm not so sure their formulas work. It all feels very sugar coated to me. Thoughts?
blog comments powered by Disqus